Tzv. flipování spoluvlastnických podílů na nemovitostech jako jeden z fenoménů současné doby
| dc.contributor.author | Chupáč, Miroslav | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Knoll, Vilém | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Hablovič, Jakub | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-22T10:45:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-22T10:45:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract-translated | Flipping itself in general is nothing more than an Anglicism for a well-known business principle. In essence, it is a general procedure for buying something cheap and selling it more expensive. However, this term is currently used for speculative trading in real estate, most often with co-ownership shares in real estate. The speculator typically tries to contact the current co-owners of the property and tries to buy at least one co-ownership share from any co-owner of the property. Once he achieves this, he can begin to very consistently use his newly acquired rights as a co-owner. It is not uncommon for the speculator to then send various letters or calls, typically with the aim of influencing the other co-owners to sell their co-ownership shares. Filing various lawsuits is not an exception. Very often, the speculator also chooses the path of filing a motion to cancel and settle the co-ownership in court, since the Civil Code allows this to practically any co-owner, with certain exceptions. Speculative transactions with real estate (or co-ownership shares in them) are generally not prohibited by law. However, in my legal practice, I have already encountered several cases where the exercise of the rights of a co-owner (speculator) may already be so-called over the edge. The question is therefore whether the speculator‘s actions should be provided with legal protection, and to what extent, taking into account the circumstances of the case. Current judicial practice generally accepts the possibility of a co-owner to request the cancellation and settlement of co-ownership at any time, with certain exceptions. However, these are typically time-limited exceptions and are rather exceptional circumstances, not rules. The question therefore arises whether (and possibly how) the phenomenon of flipping can change this current judicial practice. | en |
| dc.format | 13 s. | cs |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.24132/ZCU.NADEJE.2024.179-191 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-80-261-1323-2 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-80-261-1322-5 (brožovaná vazba) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11025/63079 | |
| dc.language.iso | cs | cs |
| dc.publisher | Západočeská univerzita v Plzni | cs |
| dc.rights | © Západočeská univerzita v Plzni | cs |
| dc.rights.access | openAccess | en |
| dc.subject | spoluvlastnictví | cs |
| dc.subject | spoluvlastník | cs |
| dc.subject | flipování | cs |
| dc.subject | vypořádání | cs |
| dc.subject | zrušení | cs |
| dc.subject | právo | cs |
| dc.subject.translated | co-ownership | en |
| dc.subject.translated | co-owner | en |
| dc.subject.translated | flipping | en |
| dc.subject.translated | settlement | en |
| dc.subject.translated | cancellation | en |
| dc.subject.translated | right | en |
| dc.title | Tzv. flipování spoluvlastnických podílů na nemovitostech jako jeden z fenoménů současné doby | cs |
| dc.type | konferenční příspěvek | cs |
| dc.type | conferenceObject | en |
| dc.type.status | Peer reviewed | en |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |
| local.files.count | 2 | * |
| local.files.size | 485620 | * |
| local.has.files | yes | * |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: