Transitions and Transformations: Evidential Relations between Archaeology and Urban Morphology

Show simple item record
dc.contributor.authorVis, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T11:00:22Z
dc.date.available2021-01-18T11:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstract-translatedThere has been a loose association between archaeology and urban morphology since its emergence. Nonetheless, it would appear relatively few urban morphologists have a proper grounding in archaeology and it seldom comes to explicit exchanges on theoretical, analytical, or purposive grounds. This is remarkable, because urban morphology, as the study of the developmental history of urban construction over time could, in certain respects, be considered as a subfield of archaeology, the discipline uniquely conceived and qualified to study human development diachronically.en
dc.format4 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationVIS, B. Transitions and Transformations: Evidential Relations between Archaeology and Urban Morphology. U+D urbanform and design, 2020, roč. 13/2020, č. 13/2020, s. 126-129. ISSN 2612-3754.cs
dc.identifier.issn2612-3754
dc.identifier.obd43931407
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/42493
dc.language.isoenen
dc.project.IDGA20-02725Y/Srovnání transformace městské morfologie z předkoloniálních do koloniálních urbánních tradiccs
dc.publisherErma di Bretschneiderit
dc.relation.ispartofseriesU+D urbanform and designen
dc.rights© Erma di Bretschneideren
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subject.translatedurban morphologyen
dc.subject.translatedarchaeologyen
dc.subject.translatedurban layouten
dc.titleTransitions and Transformations: Evidential Relations between Archaeology and Urban Morphologyen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen

Files

Collections

OBD
 Articles (KBS)