The (ama)Ndebele of Africa and their name ‘(ama)Ndebele’
Date issued
2010
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
Abstract
Some scholars still continue to confuse or to misunderstand the relationship within the
(ama)Ndebele of Africa as a result of the divergent opinions propounded by scholars regarding
the historical origin these ethnic groups. First, historians, anthropologists and
linguists such as Fourie (1921), Van Warmelo (1930), Van Vuuren (1983) and others regard
the (ama)Ndebele of the Republic of South Africa (which are divided into Southern
and Northern (ama)Ndebele) to be historically related. Others regard them as distinct
ethnic groups. Secondly, while some consider the South African (ama)Ndebele and those
of Zimbabwe to be distinct from each other, others regard them as related. What makes
matters more confusing regarding the relationship of these (ama)Ndebele ethnic groups
of Africa, is the fact that they share the same ethnic name ‘(ama)Ndebele’ and the same
language ‘isiNdebele’.
The aim of this article is, therefore, twofold a) to investigate and discuss the
historical background of (ama)Ndebele found within the borders of the Republic of South
Africa and those of Zimbabwe and b) to examine and discuss the origin of the ethnic name
‘Ndebele’ or ‘amaNdebele’. The name ‘amaNdebele’ or simply ‘Ndebele’ is a generic name
used to refer to the Nguni groups found in and outside the borders of the Republic of South
Africa. The historical origin of the name ‘(ama)Ndebele’ is also re-visited, evaluated and
discussed. In conclusion, the article shows that the (ama)Ndebele people of the Republic
of Africa (i.e., Southern and Northern (ama)Ndebele) are historically related but neither is related to those of Zimbabwe despite the fact that they share the same ethnic name
‘(ama)Ndebele’ and the same language ‘(isiNdebele)’.
Description
Subject(s)
Jihoafrická republika, etnické skupiny, Ndebele
Citation
Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni. 2010, č. 2, s. 136-150.