The downside risk approach to cost of equity determination for Slovenian, Croatian and Serbian capital markets

Show simple item record
dc.contributor.authorMomcilovic, Mirela
dc.contributor.authorZivkov, Dejan
dc.contributor.authorBegovic, Sanja Vlaovic
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-04T09:31:55Z
dc.date.available2017-10-04T09:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstract-translatedIn developed countries Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is the most frequently used model for determination of the cost of equity. On the other hand, there is no consensus about which model would be the most appropriate and easy to use for the estimation of cost of equity in emerging markets. The aim of this research is to analyze on the basis of Estrada’s work (2000; 2007) four different risk measures based on standard deviation, beta, downside risk and downside beta, as well as corresponding asset pricing models for capital markets of Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia in order to determine the most appropriate asset pricing model and to estimate the costs of equity for selected markets. It should be pointed out that asset pricing research in general is scarce for selected markets and that similar research was not done for them. Results of the research show that for total selected market the most appropriate risk measure out of four proposed is downside risk, while the model that best explains full sample mean returns contains combination of downside risk and downside beta. Results of the research favor downside risk measure for each selected market. When considering multiple regressions with the highest explanatory power for each selected market, results show that all multiple regressions contain downside risk as a risk variable and beta or downside beta as additional systematic risk variable, indicating one more time importance of downside risk for Slovenian, Croatian and Serbian capital markets. The results show that the average cost of equity estimated on the basis of asset pricing model with downside risk as a risk measure amounts to 20.16% for full sample. The results also indicate that Serbia has the highest cost of equity and that the cost of equity for Slovenian and Croatian capital markets is lower and rather similar.en
dc.format12 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2017, č. 3, s. 147-158.cs
dc.identifier.doidx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-3-010
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.uriwww.ekonomie-management.cz/download/1507051172_d84f/10_THE+DOWNSIDE+RISK+APPROACH.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/26315
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Managementcs
dc.rights© Technická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0cs
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subjectstanovení cen aktivcs
dc.subjectbetacs
dc.subjectcelkové rizikocs
dc.subjectsnížení rizikacs
dc.subjectsnížená betacs
dc.subjectnáklady na vlastním kapitálucs
dc.subjectrozvojové trhycs
dc.subject.translatedasset pricingen
dc.subject.translatedbetaen
dc.subject.translatedtotal risken
dc.subject.translateddownside risken
dc.subject.translateddownside betaen
dc.subject.translatedcost of equityen
dc.subject.translatedemerging marketsen
dc.titleThe downside risk approach to cost of equity determination for Slovenian, Croatian and Serbian capital marketsen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen

Files

Original bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Momcilovic.pdf
Size:
903.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Plný text
Download
License bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Číslo 3 (2017)
Číslo 3 (2017)