Sankce OSN: historie a současné uplatňování

dc.contributor.advisorCabadová Waisová Šárka, Doc. PhDr. Ph.D.
dc.contributor.authorVelkoborská, Nikola
dc.contributor.refereePonížilová Martina, PhDr. Ph.D.
dc.date.accepted2017-9-7
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-15T15:02:28Z
dc.date.available2017-6-6
dc.date.available2018-01-15T15:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-7-31
dc.description.abstractSankce jsou hlavním nástrojem Rady bezpečnosti OSN na udržení mezinárodního míru a bezpečnosti. Práce pojednává o sankčních režimech uvalených proti Iráku a Libyi a následně na základě Bierstekerova rámce zhodnocuje jejich efektivitu.cs
dc.description.abstract-translatedSanction regime is the main instrument of UN Security Council to preserve international peace and security. This text analysis effectiveness of this important instrument. There was only two sanction regimes used during the Cold War, against Rhodesia and South Africa. In these cases there were used economic sanctions which were not effective because governments of these countries used illegal trade for stability of the state economy. Economic sanctions had mostly bad impact on civilians. Because of this problem were introduced smart sanctions. Smart sanctions are targeted at the government of sanctioned state, or individuals. Impact of smart sanctions on civilians is minimal. Smart sanctions are also more effective than all-state sanctions. A lot of sanction regimes is not effective. Sanction regime is effective when are fulfilled purposes which are inherent in the resolution of UN Security Council. The most of sanction regimes need a lot of time to fulfilled purposes and it does not have to be a permanent. For example in case of Libya (of analyzed sanction regimes in this text). It was because of the Libyan government ended relationships with terrorists and compensated losses to states where they were committed terrorist attacks. But after some time Libya began to violate human rights and UN impose sanctions against Libya again.en
dc.description.resultObhájenocs
dc.format40 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier73403
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/27222
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rightsPlný text práce je přístupný bez omezení.cs
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subjectosncs
dc.subjectsankcecs
dc.subjectirákcs
dc.subjectlibyecs
dc.subject.translatedunen
dc.subject.translatedsanctionsen
dc.subject.translatediraqen
dc.subject.translatedlibyaen
dc.thesis.degree-grantorZápadočeská univerzita v Plzni. Fakulta filozofickács
dc.thesis.degree-levelBakalářskýcs
dc.thesis.degree-nameBc.cs
dc.thesis.degree-programMezinárodní teritoriální studiacs
dc.titleSankce OSN: historie a současné uplatňovánícs
dc.title.alternativeUN sanctions: history and present applicationen
dc.typebakalářská prácecs
local.relation.IShttps://portal.zcu.cz/StagPortletsJSR168/CleanUrl?urlid=prohlizeni-prace-detail&praceIdno=73403

Files

Original bundle
Showing 1 - 4 out of 4 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
BP Nikola Velkoborska.pdf
Size:
478.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Plný text práce
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Velkoborska_ved_mvbas.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Posudek vedoucího práce
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
BP_opo Velkoborska.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Posudek oponenta práce
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Velkoborska.pdf
Size:
346.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Průběh obhajoby práce