The concept of the right to freedom of movement in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights

Show simple item record
dc.contributor.authorMalesh, Polina
dc.contributor.editorKnoll, Vilém
dc.contributor.editorHablovič, Jakub
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T10:19:52Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T10:19:52Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstract-translatedThis article explores the relationship between the right to freedom of movement under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 and the right to liberty and security under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights through the analysis of key ECtHR cases. The freedom of movement is understood as a fundamental right that encompasses both internal movement within a state‘s territory and the ability to leave any country. This right, while essential, is not absolute and can be subject to legitimate restrictions that must meet the criteria of legality, necessity, and proportionality in a democratic society. The Court‘s interpretation of this right reflects a balance between individual liberty and legitimate state interests in maintaining public order, national security, and public health. It is underlined that while the ECtHR maintains clear distinctions between freedom of movement and deprivation of liberty, these concepts often intersect in complex ways. The Court‘s jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced approach to evaluating restrictions, considering factors such as the nature, duration, and effects of the measures imposed, as well as the broader context of their implementation. The study examines how the Court differentiates between restrictions on movement and deprivation of liberty, focusing on criteria such as duration, intensity, and specific circumstances of each case. Through analysis of landmark decisions like de Tommaso v. Italy and Assanidze v. Georgia, the article demonstrates the Court‘s approach to evaluating violations of these rights. The research emphasizes that while these rights are distinct, their interpretation requires careful consideration of the proportionality principle and the specific context in which restrictive measures are applied.en
dc.format6 s.cs
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24132/ZCU.NADEJE.2024.296-301
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1323-2
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1322-5 (brožovaná vazba)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/63124
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights© Západočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subjectsvoboda pohybucs
dc.subjectlidská právacs
dc.subjectESLPcs
dc.subjectjudikaturacs
dc.subject.translatedfreedom of movementen
dc.subject.translatedhuman rightsen
dc.subject.translatedECtHRen
dc.subject.translatedcase-lawen
dc.subject.translatedECHRen
dc.titleThe concept of the right to freedom of movement in the practice of the European Court of Human Rightsen
dc.typekonferenční příspěvekcs
dc.typeconferenceObjecten
dc.type.statusPeer revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
local.files.count2*
local.files.size450929*
local.has.filesyes*

Files

Original bundle
Showing 1 - 2 out of 2 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
978-80-261-1323-2-309-314.pdf
Size:
90.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
978-80-261-1323-2-1-13.pdf
Size:
349.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Naděje právní vědy 2024
Naděje právní vědy 2024