Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Using an Alginate Hydrogel Bioanode Encapsulated with a Filter Bag

dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Lea Ouaknin
dc.contributor.authorGandu, Bharath
dc.contributor.authorChiliveru, Abhishiktha
dc.contributor.authorDubrovin, Irina Amar
dc.contributor.authorJukanti, Avinash
dc.contributor.authorSchechter, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorCahan, Rivka
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-27T10:08:46Z
dc.date.available2025-06-27T10:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2025-06-27T10:08:46Z
dc.description.abstractThe bacterial anode of microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) is the limiting factor in a high hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). This study focused on improving biofilm attachment to a carbon-cloth anode using an alginate hydrogel. In addition, the modified bioanode was encapsulated by a filter bag that served as a physical barrier, to overcome its low mechanical strength and alginate degradation by certain bacterial species in wastewater. The MEC based on an encapsulated alginate bioanode (alginate bioanode encapsulated by a filter bag) was compared with three controls: an MEC based on a bare bioanode (non-immobilized bioanode), an alginate bioanode, and an encapsulated bioanode (bioanode encapsulated by a filter bag). At the beginning of the operation, the Rct value for the encapsulated alginate bioanode was 240.2 Omega, which decreased over time and dropped to 9.8 Omega after three weeks of operation when the Geobacter medium was used as the carbon source. When the MECs were fed with wastewater, the encapsulated alginate bioanode led to the highest current density of 9.21 +/- 0.16 Am-2 (at 0.4 V), which was 20%, 95%, and 180% higher, compared to the alginate bioanode, bare bioanode, and encapsulated bioanode, respectively. In addition, the encapsulated alginate bioanode led to the highest reduction currents of (4.14 Am-2) and HER of 0.39 m3m-3d-1. The relative bacterial distribution of Geobacter was 79%. The COD removal by all the bioanodes was between 62% and 88%. The findings of this study demonstrate that the MEC based on the encapsulated alginate bioanode exhibited notably higher bio-electroactivity compared to both bare, alginate bioanode, and an encapsulated bioanode. We hypothesize that this improvement in electron transfer rate is attributed to the preservation and the biofilm on the anode material using alginate hydrogel which was inserted into a filter bag.en
dc.format16
dc.identifier.document-number001277334800001
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym16141996
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.obd43943852
dc.identifier.orcidSchechter, Alexander 0000-0002-3464-1936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/61845
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolymers
dc.rights.accessA
dc.subjectmicrobial electrolysis cellen
dc.subjectalginate hydrogelen
dc.subjectimpedanceen
dc.subjecthydrogen evolution reactionen
dc.titleHydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Using an Alginate Hydrogel Bioanode Encapsulated with a Filter Bagen
dc.typeČlánek v databázi WoS (Jimp)
dc.typeČLÁNEK
dc.type.statusPublished Version
local.files.count1*
local.files.size3417960*
local.has.filesyes*
local.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85199644495

Files

Original bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
SCHECHTER_Hydrogen_Production.pdf
Size:
3.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: