Kontradiktornost přípravného řízení?

Show simple item record
dc.contributor.authorČihulková, Radka
dc.contributor.editorKnoll, Vilém
dc.contributor.editorHablovič, Jakub
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T09:23:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T09:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstract-translatedThis article examines the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings, par- ticularly during the preliminary phase in the Czech Republic. The adversarial nature of criminal proceedings, while not explicitly defined, is integral to the right to a fair trial, as established by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and related European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) jurisprudence. The principle ensures that both parties can present and chal- lenge evidence, promoting procedural fairness. The author highlights the tension between the adversarial nature and the investigative nature of preliminary proceedings, where efficiency and confidentiality often limit full adversarial participation. The issue is particularly evident in witness examinations and the subsequent reading of their statements in court, a practice that, in the case of a witness examination as an urgent and non-repeatable act, have been repeatedly criticized by ECtHR rulings for violating the fair trial principle. To address these concerns, the article analyzes Czech legal provisions and ECtHR’s “three-step test” for assessing the admissibility of such evidence. It suggests improvements, including mandatory audiovisual recording of witness statements and appointing an ad hoc attorney during witness examinations, to balance efficiency with the protection of defendants’ rights. In conclusion, while the pre-trial proceedings cannot fully uphold the adversarial nature of the criminal proceedings, the proposed reforms could enhance fairness and align Czech practice with modern human rights standards.en
dc.description.sponsorshipTrestní řád de lege lata i de lege ferenda v ústavněprávních souvislostech SVV 260 620/2023cs
dc.format10 s.cs
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24132/ZCU.NADEJE.2024.96-105
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1323-2
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1322-5 (brožovaná vazba)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/63066
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights© Západočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subjectkontradiktornost trestního řízenícs
dc.subjectpřípravné řízenícs
dc.subjectprávo na spravedlivý procescs
dc.subjectEvropská úmluva o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobodcs
dc.subjectEvropský soud pro lidská právacs
dc.subject.translatedadversarial nature of criminal proceedingsen
dc.subject.translatedpre-trial proceedingsen
dc.subject.translatedright to a fair trialen
dc.subject.translatedEuropean Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedomsen
dc.subject.translatedEuropean Court of Human Rightsen
dc.titleKontradiktornost přípravného řízení?cs
dc.typekonferenční příspěvekcs
dc.typeconferenceObjecten
dc.type.statusPeer revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
local.files.count2*
local.files.size473003*
local.has.filesyes*

Files

Original bundle
Showing 1 - 2 out of 2 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
978-80-261-1323-2-1-13.pdf
Size:
349.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
978-80-261-1323-2-109-118.pdf
Size:
112.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Naděje právní vědy 2024
Naděje právní vědy 2024